Opinion
7204-24S
08-02-2024
MICHELE ENDICH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge
On August 1, 2024, the parties filed a Proposed Stipulated Decision and Settlement Stipulation. However, petitioner's contact information is not included in the signature block of the Settlement Stipulation. Because the parties' Settlement Stipulation does not comply with Rule 23(a)(3) of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, it is
ORDERED that the above-referenced Settlement Stipulation is deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case. It is further
ORDERED that, on or before August 27, 2024, the parties shall file an appropriately revised settlement stipulation that includes petitioner's contact information in the signature block. It is further
ORDERED that action on the parties' above-referenced Proposed Stipulated Decision shall be held in abeyance pending further direction by the Court.
The parties are reminded that settlement stipulations are not considered "decision documents" for purposes of Rule 23(a)(4) of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure and accordingly must include the parties' contact information.