Encon appealed to this Appellate Division which vacated the court's finding for Dowd and remanded the case for a new trial. Encon Industries, Inc. v. Heritage Distributors, Inc., 1985 Mass. App. Div. 170. This Division held that as the written agreements were unambiguous, the Parol Evidence Rule precluded consideration of prior oral agreements between Encon and Heritage which were not incorporated into the parties' written contracts to alter such contracts. The distributorship agreement included the following integration clause: "This agreement, when accepted by the seller as herein provided, shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties, and no agreement, promises or representations of any character, either written or oral, not set forth in this agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto.