From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Encompass Health Rehab. Hosp. of Midland Odessa v. Becerra

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Midland/Odessa Division
Mar 8, 2024
No. 22-CV-00237-DC (W.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2024)

Opinion

22-CV-00237-DC

03-08-2024

ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MIDLAND ODESSA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. XAVIER BECERRA, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;Defendant.


ORDER

DAVID COUNTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Ronald C. Griffin related to Xavier Beccera, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services' Motion to Dismiss. In his report and recommendation, Judge Griffin recommends that the Court deny the Secretary's motion. The Secretary timely objected, and Encompass Health timely responded.

EC No. 18.

ECF No. 16.

ECF No. 19.

ECF No. 20.

A party may serve and file specific, written objections to a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and recommendation and, in doing so, secure de novo review by the district court. When no objections are timely filed, a district court can review the magistrate's report and recommendation for clear error.

See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 advisory committee's note (“When no timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”).

The Secretary objects under the belief that the Court can adjudicate this case without conducting fact-intensive analysis, contrary to the Magistrate Judge's concluding contention that it cannot. Through this narrow objection, the Secretary re-urges the arguments posed in its motion to dismiss. The Court need not conduct de novo review if objections to a report and recommendation are frivolous, general, or conclusory. Review for clear error reveals that Magistrate Judge Griffin's report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted.

See Battle v. U.S. Parole Com'n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987).

It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. The Secretary's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Encompass Health Rehab. Hosp. of Midland Odessa v. Becerra

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Midland/Odessa Division
Mar 8, 2024
No. 22-CV-00237-DC (W.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Encompass Health Rehab. Hosp. of Midland Odessa v. Becerra

Case Details

Full title:ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MIDLAND ODESSA, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Midland/Odessa Division

Date published: Mar 8, 2024

Citations

No. 22-CV-00237-DC (W.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2024)