ENCE v. AAA NEVADA INSURANCE COMPANY

Full title: JANEEN ENCE, Plaintiff, v. AAA NEVADA INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Case No. 2:11-CV-00713-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-00713-KJD-CWH.

October 27, 2011

ORDER

KENT DAWSON, District Judge

Before the Court is AAA Nevada Insurance Company's Motion to Strike (#6). Also before the Court is Plaintiff's First Motion to Amend Complaint (#9) and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint (#38). None of these motions has been opposed.¹

1 Local Rule 7-2(d) provides that failure to oppose a motion "constitute[s] a consent to granting of the motion."

AAA Nevada's Motion to Strike is based on Plaintiff naming several "Doe" and "Roe" defendants in the original complaint. Based on the motions before the Court, it appears that granting the Motion to Amend/Correct will dispose of both the Motion to Strike and the First Motion to Amend Complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint (#38) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AAA Nevada's Motion to Strike (#6) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's First Motion to Amend Complaint (#9) is DENIED as moot.