From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Enabnit v. Petsmart, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2009
Case No.: 2:07-cv-00165-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2009)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:07-cv-00165-JAM-DAD.

April 22, 2009

Mark R. Thierman Cal SB# 72913, THIERMAN LAW FIRM. P.C., Reno, Nevada.

Scott A. Miller, Esq., SB # 230322, LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT A. MILLER, A Professional Law Corporation, Encino, CA.

Steven L. Miller, Esq., SB # 106023, LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN L. MILLER, A Professional Corporation, Encino, CA.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT


WHEREAS, this matter came on for hearing on April 22, 2009, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 6 of the above-captioned court on Plaintiff's Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Maida Enabnit has applied to this Court for an order finally approving the settlement of the Action in accord with a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Settlement") which, together with the exhibits annexed thereto, sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement; and the Court having read and considered the Settlement and the exhibits annexed thereto;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Settlement, and all terms defined therein shall have the same meaning in this Order as set forth in the Settlement;

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement is Granted;

3. Class Counsel's request for attorney's fees in the amount of $570,000.00 is Granted;

4. Class Counsel's request for costs in the amount of $2,652.47 is Granted;

5. The enhancement fee to Plaintiff in the amount of $30,000.00 is Granted;

6. The Claims' Administration fees in the amount of $111,98738 is Granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Enabnit v. Petsmart, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2009
Case No.: 2:07-cv-00165-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Enabnit v. Petsmart, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Maida L. Enabnit; et al., Plaintiff, v. Petsmart, Inc.; et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 22, 2009

Citations

Case No.: 2:07-cv-00165-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ferrell v. Buckingham Prop. Mgmt.

Further, courts in this district have approved similar potential reversions (or retention) of class action…

Humphrey v. Brown Shoe Co., Inc.

A higher participation rate would have increased the amount claimed by the class and paid by Defendant.…