From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emrit v. Nat'l Football League

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 24, 2020
No. 19-2434 (4th Cir. Sep. 24, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-2434

09-24-2020

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE; WASHINGTON REDSKINS; DANIEL SNYDER, Defendants - Appellees.

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:19-cv-02968-PJM) Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint as frivolous. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Emrit's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Emrit v. Nat'l Football League

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 24, 2020
No. 19-2434 (4th Cir. Sep. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Emrit v. Nat'l Football League

Case Details

Full title:RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 24, 2020

Citations

No. 19-2434 (4th Cir. Sep. 24, 2020)