From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emrit v. Nat'l Football League

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 17, 2020
No. 20-1040 (4th Cir. Mar. 17, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-1040

03-17-2020

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE; WASHINGTON REDSKINS; DANIEL SNYDER, Defendants - Appellees.

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-01302-CMH-TCB) Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit filed his civil complaint and a notice of appeal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Upon review of the district court's docket, we cannot find any order—much less an appealable one—within Emrit's case. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Emrit v. Nat'l Football League

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 17, 2020
No. 20-1040 (4th Cir. Mar. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Emrit v. Nat'l Football League

Case Details

Full title:RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 17, 2020

Citations

No. 20-1040 (4th Cir. Mar. 17, 2020)