From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emrit v. Combs

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Apr 3, 2024
No. 24-CV-83-JFH-JAR (E.D. Okla. Apr. 3, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-83-JFH-JAR

04-03-2024

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff, v. SEAN “P. DIDDY” COMBS et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN F. HEIL, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jason A. Robertson. Dkt. No. 8. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the case be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and because the claims asserted by Plaintiff are patently frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

Neither party objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation within the fourteen-day period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and accepts and adopts it as the order of this Court. On that basis, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Emrit v. Combs

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Apr 3, 2024
No. 24-CV-83-JFH-JAR (E.D. Okla. Apr. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Emrit v. Combs

Case Details

Full title:RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff, v. SEAN “P. DIDDY” COMBS et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 3, 2024

Citations

No. 24-CV-83-JFH-JAR (E.D. Okla. Apr. 3, 2024)