From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Employment Security Comm. v. Corley

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Jan 21, 1963
148 So. 2d 715 (Miss. 1963)

Summary

holding this Court is bound by the Board's finding of fact that claimant voluntarily quit her employment where finding of fact is amply supported by evidence

Summary of this case from Huckabee v. Miss. Employment Security Comm

Opinion

No. 42530.

January 21, 1963.

1. Employment Security Law — finding that claimant voluntarily left employment because of pregnancy, supported by evidence.

Finding that claimant for unemployment benefits had left employment voluntarily because of pregnancy, and was not, as she claimed, discharged because of company policy regarding pregnancy was supported by evidence. Secs. 7379(a), 7388, Code 1942.

2. Employment Security Law — one who left work because of pregnancy, considered to have voluntarily severed her employment without cause.

Married woman who has left work because of pregnancy is considered to have voluntarily severed her employment without good cause within meaning of unemployment compensation statute. Sec. 7379(a), Code 1942.

Headnotes as approved by Rodgers, J.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Coahoma County; E.H. GREEN, Judge.

H.L. Hutcherson, Jackson, for appellant.

I. The appellee left her work voluntarily without good cause within the meaning of the law. Franklin v. Mississippi Employment Security Comm., 242 Miss. 447, 136 So.2d 197; Luke v. Mississippi Employment Security Comm., 239 Miss. 292, 123 So.2d 231; Mississippi Unemployment Compensation Comm. v. Avent, 192 Miss. 85, 4 So.2d 296; Secs. 7369(a), 7379(a), Code 1942.

Stovall Lowrey, Clarksdale, for appellee.

I. Cited and discussed the following authorities. Farloo v. Champion Spark Plug Co., 145 Ohio St. 263, 61 N.E.2d 313; Franklin v. Mississippi Employment Security Comm., 242 Miss. 447, 136 So.2d 197; Klaniecki v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 190 Pa. Super. 324, 154 A.2d 419; Luke v. Mississippi Employment Security Comm., 239 Miss. 292, 123 So.2d 231; Mississippi Employment Security Comm. v. Blasingame, 237 Miss. 744, 116 So.2d 213; Smith v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 396 Pa. 557, 154 A.2d 492; Sec. 7379(a), Code 1942.


This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Coahoma County, Mississippi, reversing an order of the Board of Review of the Mississippi Employment Security Commission. The order affirmed the Referee's finding that appellee was disqualified to receive benefits under Sec. 7379 (a), Miss. Code 1942, Rec.

Appellee filed an initial claim for benefits in which she alleged that she was discharged because of company policy on pregnancy. Appellee was last employed by the Porcelain Constructors, Inc., as secretary and operator of a bookkeeping machine and a machine which made pictures.

At the hearing before the Referee, she testified that she was pregnant and that her employer permitted her to work an extra month but she was told that it was dangerous for her to continue to work because the plant was "back behind a bunch of railroad tracks" and she had to climb up and down steps to get into the office. She had planned to work until December but was required to quit in October.

The only issue for determination is whether or not appellee voluntarily left her employment within the meaning of Sec. 7379 (a), Code 1942, Rec., supra.

The Board of Review affirmed the order of the Referee in which he found as a fact that "Under the circumstances claimant is deemed to have left work voluntarily. The reason for her leaving work was due to the fact she was pregnant. Since claimant's separation from work was due to a marital circumstance, i.e., pregnancy, she is subject to disqualification under the above section of the law."

The applicable part of Sec. 7388, Miss. Code 1942, Rec., is in the following language: "* * * In any judicial proceedings under this section, the findings of the Board of Review as to the facts, if supported by evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of said court shall be confined to questions of law. * * *"

(Hn 1) We are of the opinion that the holding of the Board of Review is amply supported by evidence in the record, and there can be little question but that appellee quit work because she was pregnant. Moreover, this Court is bound by the finding of fact in this case.

(Hn 2) This Court has heretofore held that a married woman who leaves her work because of pregnancy is considered to have voluntarily severed her employment, and without good cause within the meaning of Sec. 7379 (a), Code 1942, Rec., supra. See Ruth Luke v. Miss. Employment Security Commission, 239 Miss. 292, 123 So.2d 231; Mattie B. Franklin v. Miss. Employment Security Commission, 242 Miss. 447, 136 So.2d 197.

Judgment of the circuit court will therefore be reversed, and the order of the Board of Review reinstated, denying the application of appellee for employment security benefits.

Reversed and order of Board of Review reinstated.

McGehee, C.J., and Kyle, Ethridge and Jones, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Employment Security Comm. v. Corley

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Jan 21, 1963
148 So. 2d 715 (Miss. 1963)

holding this Court is bound by the Board's finding of fact that claimant voluntarily quit her employment where finding of fact is amply supported by evidence

Summary of this case from Huckabee v. Miss. Employment Security Comm
Case details for

Employment Security Comm. v. Corley

Case Details

Full title:MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION v. CORLEY

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi

Date published: Jan 21, 1963

Citations

148 So. 2d 715 (Miss. 1963)
148 So. 2d 715

Citing Cases

Mississippi Emp. Sec. Comm. v. Stafford

III. The findings of the Board of Review as to the facts are fully supported by the evidence and are…

Whitehead v. Mississippi Emp. Sec. Com'n

In this opinion, we hold only that Mrs. Smith's employment continued during her pregnancy, by virtue of an…