From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Fairchild Press

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1952
279 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

March 18, 1952.

Present — Cohn, J.P., Callahan, Van Voorhis, Shientag and Foster, JJ. [See post, p. 1045.]


Order granting third-party defendant-respondent's motion to dismiss the third-party complaint herein unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. We do not construe the complaint to exclude common-law negligence or to be confined solely to alleging violations of section 241 Lab. of the Labor Law. The question whether a valid cross claim exists should await trial. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Fairchild Press

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1952
279 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Fairchild Press

Case Details

Full title:EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Vanino v. Bruckman

Under the circumstances, whether the defendant can be held liable at all, or if so held would be a joint…

Fox v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Order unanimously reversed and the motion granted. (See Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. v.…