From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Employers Ins. of Wausau v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1988
141 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 6, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant's motion is denied, the plaintiff's cross motion is granted, and it is declared that the plaintiff has no obligation or duty to defend the County of Nassau in the underlying negligence action.

Pursuant to an agreement between a contractor and the respondent County of Nassau for the contractor to resurface certain roads in Nassau County, the appellant, an insurance company, issued a policy providing coverage for liability arising out of negligent operations or supervision in the course of the resurfacing project. Subsequently, a claim of negligence arising out of a fatal motorcycle accident was brought against the respondent. Although the accident occurred on a road where resurfacing had just commenced, the site of the accident was located nearly one mile from the nearest resurfacing that had been undertaken and was entirely unrelated to the resurfacing project. The appellant waited more than six months after being notified of the claim against the respondent before it issued a disclaimer of coverage. Because the policy only covered liability arising out of negligent operations or supervision in the course of resurfacing, the appellant claimed that it did not apply to liability arising out of the above-mentioned accident.

The Supreme Court erroneously applied Insurance Law § 3420 (d) to this case. That provision only estops an insurance company from disclaiming coverage where it has delayed unreasonably in doing so if the policy at issue would provide the claimed coverage but for a policy exclusion. Because the provisions of the policy simply never created coverage in the first place, the appellant, regardless of whether or not it was timely in issuing its disclaimer, is not estopped from doing so and has no obligation to provide the respondent with a legal defense (see, Zappone v Home Ins. Co., 55 N.Y.2d 131). Thompson, J.P., Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Employers Ins. of Wausau v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1988
141 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Employers Ins. of Wausau v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Wausau Insurance Companies v. Feldman

Further, the actions of Downstate estop it from disclaiming liability, responsibility and the obligation to…

U.S. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Staten Island Hospital

The plaintiff admits that it first learned of the grounds for disclaimer of coverage on January 7, 1987, at…