From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richard v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Aug 31, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-3501 SECTION P (W.D. La. Aug. 31, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-3501 SECTION P

08-31-2016

EMILE DANIEL RICHARD LA. DOC #598267 v. WARDEN


MAGISTRATE JUDGE C. MICHAEL HILL

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record including the objections filed by petitioner, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time-barred by the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §2244(d).

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Lafayette, Louisiana, on this 31 day of August, 2016.

/s/ _________

REBECCA F. DOHERTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Richard v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Aug 31, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-3501 SECTION P (W.D. La. Aug. 31, 2016)
Case details for

Richard v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:EMILE DANIEL RICHARD LA. DOC #598267 v. WARDEN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 31, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-3501 SECTION P (W.D. La. Aug. 31, 2016)