From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emery v. Costanzo

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jan 5, 2017
SC: 154357 (Mich. Jan. 5, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154357

01-05-2017

JEFFREY ALLEN EMERY and KATHERINA WEISS-EMERY, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants-Appellees, v. PAUL R. COSTANZO and WANDA B. COSTANZO, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs-Appellants.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 327115
Kalamazoo CC: 2014-000314-CZ

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 5, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Emery v. Costanzo

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jan 5, 2017
SC: 154357 (Mich. Jan. 5, 2017)
Case details for

Emery v. Costanzo

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY ALLEN EMERY and KATHERINA WEISS-EMERY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Jan 5, 2017

Citations

SC: 154357 (Mich. Jan. 5, 2017)