An examination of appellant's objections to the magistrate's decision dated November 12, 1998 indicates that she made no reference to the magistrate's failure to recommend that appellee continue to make in-kind contributions. In Emerson v. Emerson (Apr. 9, 1999), Montgomery App. No. 17312, unreported, at 7-8, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 1565, the Second Appellate District realized that: "An `invitation' to a trial court to search the record for deficiencies in a document does not constitute the specific statements, with particularity, of objections required by Civ.R. 53(E)(3).