From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emerging Vision, Inc. v. Glachman

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Aug 10, 2010
CASE NO. 10-80734-CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC (S.D. Fla. Aug. 10, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10-80734-CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC.

August 10, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


THIS CAUSE comes before the Court pursuant to the June 29, 2010 [DE 8] Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Barry S. Seltzer. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and has conducted a de novo review of the underlying record. It is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, AFFIRMED and APPROVED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, filed June 22, 2010 [DE 5] is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED at Chambers in West Palm Beach, Florida.


Summaries of

Emerging Vision, Inc. v. Glachman

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Aug 10, 2010
CASE NO. 10-80734-CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC (S.D. Fla. Aug. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Emerging Vision, Inc. v. Glachman

Case Details

Full title:EMERGING VISION, INC., a New York corporation, and COMBINED BUYING GROUP…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: Aug 10, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 10-80734-CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC (S.D. Fla. Aug. 10, 2010)

Citing Cases

Xylem, Inc. v. Church

"Before addressing whether [Plaintiff has] met this four-prong showing, however, the Court must first…

Tempur-Pedic N. Am., LLC v. Mattress Firm, Inc.

"Before addressing whether [Plaintiffs have] met this four-prong showing, however, the Court must first…