From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emam v. Cmty. Action P'ship of Ramsey

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Feb 17, 2022
970 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. 2022)

Opinion

A21-1261

02-17-2022

Fatuma EMAM, Relator, v. COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF RAMSEY and SFM Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.

Fatuma Emam, Coon Rapids, Minnesota, pro se. Thomas P. Davern, Lynn, Scharfenberg and Hollick, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.


Fatuma Emam, Coon Rapids, Minnesota, pro se.

Thomas P. Davern, Lynn, Scharfenberg and Hollick, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 1, 2021, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that summary affirmances lack precedential value "because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," and because they "do no more than establish the law of the case").

BY THE COURT:

/s/

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Emam v. Cmty. Action P'ship of Ramsey

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Feb 17, 2022
970 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. 2022)
Case details for

Emam v. Cmty. Action P'ship of Ramsey

Case Details

Full title:Fatuma EMAM, Relator, v. COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF RAMSEY and SFM…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Date published: Feb 17, 2022

Citations

970 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. 2022)