From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E.M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

March, 1934.


Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The amended complaint states a cause of action. ( Potter v. Ellice, 48 N.Y. 321; Havens v. Patterson, 43 id. 218, 221; Cornell v. Hayden, 114 id. 271, 278; Lewis v. Smith, 9 id. 502.) Defendant's time to answer is extended until ten days after the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

E.M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

E.M. Townsend, Inc. v. Skodnick

Case Details

Full title:E.M. TOWNSEND, INC., Appellant, v. KEVA SKODNICK, Executor, etc., of MARY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)