From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elwood-Garza v. Antolik

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 27, 2006
164 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Jan. 23, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Leslie Elwood-Garza, San Diego, CA, pro se.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-05-00204-TJW.

Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Clerk shall file the following: appellant's opening brief received August 3,

Page 638.

2005, appellant's motion for appointment of counsel received August 3, 2005, appellant's amended proof of service received August 5, 2005, and appellant's letter received September 26, 2005.

A review of the record, the opening brief, and appellant's response to the October 19, 2005 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Elwood-Garza v. Antolik

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 27, 2006
164 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Elwood-Garza v. Antolik

Case Details

Full title:Leslie ELWOOD-GARZA, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. ANTOLIK, Special Agent; et…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 27, 2006

Citations

164 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2006)