From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elter v. Ritvo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1996
228 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 3, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Material questions of fact remain as to whether the plaintiff John R. Elter suffered a "serious injury" as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and whether the injury was proximately caused by the accident ( see, Beckett v. Conte, 176 A.D.2d 774; Petrone v Thornton, 166 A.D.2d 513; Gokey v. Castine, 163 A.D.2d 709; Partlow v. Meehan, 155 A.D.2d 647; Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on these issues. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Elter v. Ritvo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1996
228 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Elter v. Ritvo

Case Details

Full title:JOHN R. ELTER et al., Appellants, v. SAMUEL RITVO et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 424

Citing Cases

Herard v. Alltex Laminating Corp.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. There are issues of fact which preclude the granting of…

Dabbs v. Kelly

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to dismiss the respondents'…