Opinion
June 3, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Material questions of fact remain as to whether the plaintiff John R. Elter suffered a "serious injury" as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and whether the injury was proximately caused by the accident ( see, Beckett v. Conte, 176 A.D.2d 774; Petrone v Thornton, 166 A.D.2d 513; Gokey v. Castine, 163 A.D.2d 709; Partlow v. Meehan, 155 A.D.2d 647; Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on these issues. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.