From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elster v. Alexander

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 13, 1979
608 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1979)

Summary

refusing to treat improper appeal of denial of class certification as petition for mandamus and noting that order regarding certification is open to modification throughout trial

Summary of this case from Kochlin v. Norwest MTG

Opinion

No. 77-3276.

December 13, 1979.

Edward L. Savell, Atlanta, Ga., Pincus, Munzer, Bizar, D'Alessandro Dugan, Irving Bizar, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ronald L. Reid, Charles S. Johnson, III, Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for Price Waterhouse.

Gary W. Hatch, Hugh M. Dorsey, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for all remaining defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before TUTTLE, VANCE and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.


William Elster appeals the district court's order denying his motion for class certification under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 in a securities fraud case. Elster appealed on October 26, 1977, asserting jurisdiction in this court under the "death knell" doctrine and the collateral order doctrine articulated in Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). In February 1978, defendants moved to dismiss the appeal arguing that the district court's order was not final, thus was not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

In Coopers Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 98 S.Ct. 2454, 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978), decided June 21, 1978, the Supreme Court rejected Elster's jurisdictional contentions and held that "orders relating to class certification are not independently appealable under § 1291 prior to judgment." 437 U.S. at 470, 98 S.Ct. at 2458.

In the wake of Coopers Lybrand, Elster urges that we treat his appeal as a petition for mandamus. See Leesona Corp. v. Cotwool Manufacturing Corp., 308 F.2d 895 (4th Cir. 1962); Arrowhead Co. v. The Aimee Lykes, 193 F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1951). He seeks the writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to conduct a hearing in making a class determination.

Elster cites our holding in Satterwhite v. City of Greenville, 578 F.2d 987, 993 n. 7 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), to support his contention that a hearing was mandatory. He convincingly reasons that if a hearing had been held he would have then been afforded the opportunity to amend and tailor his complaint to eliminate the district court's valid objections to class certification.

Elster retains the opportunity to amend his pleading, however, upon return of the case to the district court.

Rule 15(a) declares that leave to amend "shall be freely given when justice so requires"; this mandate is to be heeded.

Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 230, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962). He may then renew his motion for class certification. The district court has a continuing power under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(1). Its certification decision "is not irreversible and may be altered or amended at a later date." 7A C. Wright A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1785, at 137 (1972).

We perceive no basis for concluding that following this decision the district court will not handle these matters properly as they are presented to it. A writ of mandamus is clearly unnecessary at this stage, and we decline to decide the circumstances, if any, under which its issuance might be appropriate.

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Elster v. Alexander

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 13, 1979
608 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1979)

refusing to treat improper appeal of denial of class certification as petition for mandamus and noting that order regarding certification is open to modification throughout trial

Summary of this case from Kochlin v. Norwest MTG
Case details for

Elster v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ELSTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOMAS W. ALEXANDER ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 13, 1979

Citations

608 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1979)

Citing Cases

Sanders v. Robinson Humphrey/American Express, Inc.

Elsterv. Alexander, 76 F.R.D. 440, 442 (N.D. Ga. 1977), appeal dismissed, 608 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1979). The…

Stephen v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car

The district judge must define, redefine, subclass, and decertify as appropriate in response to the…