From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elson v. Johnson & Johnson Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 1, 2013
Case No. CV13-1824- JST (N.D. Cal. May. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CV13-1824- JST

05-01-2013

VICKIE ELSON and RICHARD ROSENBOM Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., THOMAS P. SCHMALZRIED, M.D., YANCEY & ASSOCIATES and DOES ONE through ONE HUNDRED, Defendants.

ALEXANDER G. CALFO (SBN 152891) KELLEY S. OLAH (SBN 245180) BARNES & THORNBURG LLP Attorneys for Defendants DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON (erroneously sued as "Johnson & Johnson, Inc."); and YANCEY & ASSOCIATES


ALEXANDER G. CALFO (SBN 152891)
KELLEY S. OLAH (SBN 245180)
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.; JOHNSON &
JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.; JOHNSON &
JOHNSON (erroneously sued as "Johnson & Johnson,
Inc."); and YANCEY & ASSOCIATES

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

STIPULATION TO STAY ALL

PROCEEDINGS


JURY TRIAL DEMANDED


Trial Date: None Set

TO ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Stay Proceedings submitted by Plaintiffs VICKIE ELSON and RICHARD ROSENBOM and Defendants DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON (erroneously sued as "Johnson & Johnson, Inc."), and YANCEY & ASSOCIATES (hereafter collectively "the Parties"); upon consideration of all documents, files, and pleadings in this action; and upon good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Parties' request for a stay of proceedings is GRANTED;

2. All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed, pending a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on whether this case should be transferred to In re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2244.

3. Deadlines relating to any outstanding responsive pleading are extended pending entry of a Scheduling Order in the MDL court addressing responsive pleadings and the deadline to file any remand motion is extended pursuant to the MDL court's August 14, 2012 "Order Regarding Cases Removed from State Court," and any subsequent orders that the MDL Court may issue.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

HON. JON S. TIGAR


Summaries of

Elson v. Johnson & Johnson Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 1, 2013
Case No. CV13-1824- JST (N.D. Cal. May. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Elson v. Johnson & Johnson Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VICKIE ELSON and RICHARD ROSENBOM Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV13-1824- JST (N.D. Cal. May. 1, 2013)