Niccum v. Niccum, 734 N.E.2d 637, 639 (Ind.Ct.App. 2000). Under those rules, "[w]here the parties fix no time for the performance or discharge of obligations created by the contract[, ] they are assumed to have had in mind a reasonable time." City of E. Chicago, Ind. v. E. Chicago Second Century, Inc., 908 N.E.2d 611, 623 (Ind. 2009); see also Elrod v. Bauman, 136 N.E.3d 232, 242 (Ind.Ct.App. 2019), ("Where no time for performance is specified in the contract the law will imply that it must be performed within a reasonable time." (quotations and citation omitted)),