From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elrite v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0303 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0303 DAD P.

February 10, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The filing fee has been paid. Upon review of the habeas petition, the court finds that it is incomplete. Petitioner has not provided this court with the name and location of the court that entered the judgment of conviction being challenged. In addition, petitioner has not informed this court whether he has exhausted state court remedies for each of the grounds for which he seeks federal habeas relief and, if so, how he has allegedly done so.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the service of this order, petitioner shall file a response to this order by providing the court with the information requested above.


Summaries of

Elrite v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0303 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Elrite v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:GARY LEE ELRITE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0303 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)