From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elmore v. Arong

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 20, 2010
No. 2: 07-cv-1463 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2: 07-cv-1463 WBS KJN P.

December 20, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 12, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Because plaintiff, by his failure to file any opposition to the motion despite being given several extensions of time and opportunities to do so, has clearly demonstrated that he has no objection to the granting of defendant Turella's motion for summary judgement, and because the motion appears to have merit, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Turella's motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

DATED: December 17, 2010


Summaries of

Elmore v. Arong

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 20, 2010
No. 2: 07-cv-1463 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Elmore v. Arong

Case Details

Full title:TONIE ELMORE, Plaintiff, v. ARONG, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 20, 2010

Citations

No. 2: 07-cv-1463 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2010)