From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elmira Structures, Inc. v. Hartnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 14, 1989
149 A.D.2d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 14, 1989

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The determination of the Commissioner of Labor that petitioner willfully failed to pay 14 employees the prevailing wage, resulting in an underpayment of $2,397.07, is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner, an experienced contractor, knew or should have known that these employees were performing carpentry or ironwork, yet it improperly classified and paid them lower wages as laborers (see, Matter of Frey Campbell v. Hartnett, 139 A.D.2d 928; Gross Plumbing Heating Co. v. New York State Dept. of Labor, 133 A.D.2d 524; Matter of Cam-Ful Indus. [Roberts], 128 A.D.2d 1006). We also find substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's imposition of 10% annual interest and a civil penalty of $360 (see, Labor Law § 220; Banking Law § 14-a; Matter of Hull-Hazard, Inc. v Roberts, 136 A.D.2d 872, 874; Matter of Nelson's Lamp Lighters v Roberts, 136 A.D.2d 810, 811, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 702; Matter of Cam-Ful Indus. [Roberts], supra, at 1007; cf., Fra-Dee Constr. v. Roberts, 132 A.D.2d 924, 926, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 611).


Summaries of

Elmira Structures, Inc. v. Hartnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 14, 1989
149 A.D.2d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Elmira Structures, Inc. v. Hartnett

Case Details

Full title:ELMIRA STRUCTURES, INC., Petitioner, v. THOMAS F. HARTNETT, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
540 N.Y.S.2d 48

Citing Cases

TPK Construction Corp. v. Hudacs

In 1988 petitioner was found guilty of a nonwillful violation of prevailing wage requirements on the…

FAST TRAK STRUCTURES, INC. v. HARTNETT

We agree. Petitioner does not contest the fact that violations occurred; petitioner takes issue only with the…