Elmer v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Full title: VERN ELMER, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; AND NATIONAL DEFAULT…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

2:22-cv-01584-RFB-EJY (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01584-RFB-EJY

12-20-2022

VERN ELMER, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; AND NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORP.; and Does I-X, and Roe Corporations I-X, inclusive, Defendants.

Kent F. Larsen, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 3463, Karl L. Nielson, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 5082, SMITH LARSEN & WIXOM, Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. NEVADA'S LAWYERS, Allison R. Schmidt Allison R. Schmidt, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10743, Attorneys for Plaintiff Vern Elmer. TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A., Krista J. Nielson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10698, Attorneys for Defendant National Default Servicing Corporation.

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Kent F. Larsen, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 3463, Karl L. Nielson, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 5082, SMITH LARSEN & WIXOM, Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

NEVADA'S LAWYERS, Allison R. Schmidt Allison R. Schmidt, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10743, Attorneys for Plaintiff Vern Elmer.

TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A., Krista J. Nielson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10698, Attorneys for Defendant National Default Servicing Corporation.

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES RE: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (ECF 15); AND, NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION'S JOINDER TO JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (ECF 16)

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff Vern Elmer (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and National Default Servicing Corporation (“NDSC”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Plaintiff shall have through Tuesday, January 17, 2023 to file Plaintiff's opposition/response to Chase's Motion to Dismiss (ECF 15) and to NDSC's Joinder in Chase's Motion to Dismiss (ECF 16); and,

2. Chase and NDSC shall each have through Tuesday, January 31, 2023 to file their reply briefs in response to any opposition/response brief filed by Plaintiff.

The Court is advised that this request is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is to allow the parties additional time to brief the issues for the Court in an orderly fashion (and in light of the conflicting schedules of involved counsel during the upcoming holiday period).

IT IS SO ORDERED: