Opinion
2:22-cv-01584-RFB-EJY
11-16-2022
VERN ELMER, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; AND NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORP.; and Does I-X, and Roe Corporations I-X, inclusive, Defendants.
SMITH LARSEN & WIXOM KENT F. LARSEN, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 3463 HILLS CENTER BUSINESS PARK ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A. KRISTA J. NIELSON, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 10698 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION NEVADA'S LAWYERS ALLISON R. SCHMIDT, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 10743 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VERN ELMER
SMITH LARSEN & WIXOM KENT F. LARSEN, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 3463 HILLS CENTER BUSINESS PARK ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A. KRISTA J. NIELSON, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 10698 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION
NEVADA'S LAWYERS ALLISON R. SCHMIDT, ESQ. NEVADA BAR NO. 10743 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VERN ELMER
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)
Plaintiff Vern Elmer (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and National Default Servicing Corp. (“NDSC”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agreed as follows:
1. Defendants Chase and NDSC shall have through and including Tuesday, December 13, 2022, to file responses to the Complaint in this matter.
The parties respectfully submit that the instant stipulation is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is to allow the parties to further discuss the potential for informal resolution of the issues raised in this case, to accommodate an unexpected medical procedure involving one of the undersigned counsel, and to otherwise properly and orderly address any issues pending before the Court as raised in the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.