From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellison v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 14, 1971
479 P.2d 461 (Nev. 1971)

Opinion

No. 6173

January 14, 1971

Appeal from the First Judicial District Court, Churchill County; Richard L. Waters, Jr., J.

Martillaro and Bucchianeri, of Carson City, for Appellant.

Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General, of Carson City, and Dennis E. Evans, District Attorney, Churchill County, for Respondent.


OPINION


A jury found Ellison guilty of cattle theft. We are asked to void the conviction because the prosecutor expressed his belief that the defendant was guilty. The evidence of guilt was substantial. Its sufficiency is not questioned. The court instructed the jury that counsel's statements were not evidence. The prosecutor's several statements suggesting guilt and his belief therein were made in relation to evidence pointing to guilt. Cf. State v. Cyty, 50 Nev. 256, 256 P. 793 (1927). Although the prosecutor should not have expressed his belief, his statements, within the context of this case, were harmless. NRS 177.255.

Other assigned errors are not considered since no supporting authority is offered and none concern constitutional rights.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ellison v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 14, 1971
479 P.2d 461 (Nev. 1971)
Case details for

Ellison v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDE LARKIN ELLISON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jan 14, 1971

Citations

479 P.2d 461 (Nev. 1971)
479 P.2d 461

Citing Cases

Weaver v. State, Dep't of Motor Vehicles

Weaver understandably does not even suggest that retaining a driver's license is a fundamental right. Liggett…

Thurston v. Thurston

5. Other assertions of error are raised only in the reply brief without citation of authority and with little…