From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Jul 2, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:07CV231 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 2, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:07CV231.

July 2, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiffs Donald Ellis, Horace Fogle, Phillip Thomas, John Staggs and Donald Crago filed the above-styled lawsuit on September 28, 2007, in the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. The matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.

On June 16, 2008, Defendant filed Motions to Transfer Venue, seeking a transfer of each Plaintiff's claims to a different district (see document #45, #46, #47 and #48). A response was filed by Plaintiffs Staggs, Crago and Thomas on June 30, 2008. Recently, the Fifth Circuit granted a petition for rehearing en banc regarding the decision of In re Volkswagen , 506 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 2007), vacating its previous opinion and judgment and staying the mandate. See In re Volkswagen, No. 07-40058 (5th Cir. Feb. 14, 2008) (order granting petition). An oral argument was conducted in that case on May 22, 2008.

The undersigned finds that the Volkswagen decision is central to an analysis of a 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) transfer in this Circuit. As a result, the case should be stayed pending the en banc decision of the Fifth Circuit in Volkswagen. In light of the foregoing, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-styled case is STAYED, pending the en banc decision of the Fifth Circuit in the matter of In Re Volkswagen.

So ORDERED and SIGNED.


Summaries of

Ellis v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Jul 2, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:07CV231 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Ellis v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:DONALD ELLIS, ET AL. v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division

Date published: Jul 2, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:07CV231 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 2, 2008)