From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Target Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2016
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-00118-SVW-RAO (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2016)

Summary

noting that "it is [the plaintiff's] burden to set forth evidence that affords a reasonable basis to conclude that [the defendant] had notice of a dangerous condition and reasonable time to remove the condition"

Summary of this case from Biernacki v. Target Corp.

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-00118-SVW-RAO

07-20-2016

Daniela Ellis, Plaintiff v. Target Corporation, et al., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Judgment is entered for Defendant and against Plaintiff, pursuant to the Court's order dated July 19, 2016. DATE: July 20, 2016

/s/_________

STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ellis v. Target Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2016
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-00118-SVW-RAO (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2016)

noting that "it is [the plaintiff's] burden to set forth evidence that affords a reasonable basis to conclude that [the defendant] had notice of a dangerous condition and reasonable time to remove the condition"

Summary of this case from Biernacki v. Target Corp.
Case details for

Ellis v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Daniela Ellis, Plaintiff v. Target Corporation, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 20, 2016

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-00118-SVW-RAO (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2016)

Citing Cases

Biernacki v. Target Corp.

Other courts have similarly granted summary judgment where the plaintiff failed to introduce affirmative…