From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Sifuentes

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2024
4:24-cv-00080-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-00080-JM-JJV

06-28-2024

CHRISTIAN JAMAL ELLIS ADC #162538 PLAINTIFF v. ANTHONY SIFUENTES, Lieutenant, Varner Supermax, ADC; et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. 39) No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has passed. After careful review, this Court adopts the Partial Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects.

Therefore, Plaintiff may proceed with his excessive force, battery, failure to protect, and inadequate medical care claims against Defendants Sifuentes, Taylor, Corporal Dunlap, Sergeant Dunlap, Blair, White, and Williams in their personal capacities only. All other claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendants Ryas and Hollingsworth are DISMISSED without prejudice as parties to this lawsuit. Defendant Hollingsworth's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17) is DENIED as moot. And it is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Ellis v. Sifuentes

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2024
4:24-cv-00080-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Ellis v. Sifuentes

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIAN JAMAL ELLIS ADC #162538 PLAINTIFF v. ANTHONY SIFUENTES…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 28, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-00080-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2024)