From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Sifuentes

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 26, 2024
4:24-cv-00080-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Mar. 26, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-00080-JM-JJV

03-26-2024

CHRISTIAN JAMAL ELLIS ADC #162538 PLAINTIFF v. ANTHONY SIFUENTES, Lieutenant, Varner Supermax, ADC; et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. 5) No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has passed. After careful review, this Court adopts the Partial Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects.

Therefore, Plaintiff may proceed with his excessive force, failure to protect, inadequate medical care, and battery claims against Defendants Sifuentes, Taylor, Corporal Dunlap, Sergeant Dunlap, Blair, White, Williams, Ryas, and Doe. All other claims as well as Defendants Barden, Carroll, and Gibson are dismissed without prejudice. And it is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Ellis v. Sifuentes

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 26, 2024
4:24-cv-00080-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Mar. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Ellis v. Sifuentes

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIAN JAMAL ELLIS ADC #162538 PLAINTIFF v. ANTHONY SIFUENTES…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 26, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-00080-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Mar. 26, 2024)