From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Shaprell

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Aug 20, 2007
Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-03 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-03 (HL).

August 20, 2007


ORDER


Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) from United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Hodge that recommends denying Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause (Doc. 6), Plaintiff's Motion to Restraining Order (Doc. 7), and Plaintiff's Motion to File Harassment Court Order (Doc. 8). Plaintiff subsequently filed an Objection (Doc. 35) to the Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has thoroughly considered Plaintiff's objection and has made a de novo determination of the portion of the recommendation to which Plaintiff objects. While Plaintiff does provide the Court with additional allegations in his Objection, Plaintiff has nevertheless failed to meet the requirement of injunctive relief as explained by Judge Hodge in the Recommendation. Accordingly, Judge Hodge's Recommendation is accepted and Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause (Doc. 6), Plaintiff's Motion to Restraining Order (Doc. 7), and Plaintiff's Motion to File Harassment Court Order (Doc. 8) are denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ellis v. Shaprell

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Aug 20, 2007
Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-03 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Ellis v. Shaprell

Case Details

Full title:RECKO ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER SHAPRELL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-03 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 20, 2007)