From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 25, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0767 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0767 MCE EFB P.

October 25, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner is a prisoner seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 2, 2006, the court found that petitioner had not filed an opposition to respondent's July 14, 2006, motion to dismiss and recommended dismissal of the action without prejudice. On December 18, 2006, the district judge adopted those findings and recommendations and ordered the case closed. On December 18, 2006, petitioner filed a request for an extension of time in which to file belated objections to the findings and recommendations. On January 23, 2007, the district judge vacated the order adopting the findings and recommendations and granted petitioner's request for an enlargement of time within which to file objections.

On February 6, 2007, petitioner filed objections. As of this date, petitioner has yet to file an opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss or responded in any way to the arguments contained therein.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner is granted an extension of time of 30 days from the date this order is served within which to file a pleading in response to respondent's motion to dismiss.

2. Failure to comply with this order will result in the renewed issuance of the court's November 2, 2006, findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Ellis v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 25, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0767 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Ellis v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:REISH CARL ELLIS, Petitioner, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 25, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0767 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2007)