From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 24, 2009
No. CIV S-06-0767 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0767 MCE EFB P.

September 24, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. A judge "entertaining an application for a writ of habeas corpus shall forthwith award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto." 28 U.S.C. § 2243. It is not apparent from the face of the application that the petitioner is not entitled to relief.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:

1. Respondent shall file and serve either an answer or a motion in response to petitioner's January 22, 2009 amended application within 60 days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. Any response shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. See Rules 4, 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases.

2. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of an answer.

3. If the response to petitioner's application is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed within 15 days thereafter.


Summaries of

Ellis v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 24, 2009
No. CIV S-06-0767 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Ellis v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:REISH CARL ELLIS, Petitioner, v. DAVID RUNNELS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 24, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0767 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2009)