From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2954 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2954 DAD P

01-04-2012

ROBERT ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. RICK HILL, Warden, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

By an order filed November 23, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to file a properly completed in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

Plaintiff previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (See Doc. No. 5.)

_________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ellis v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2954 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Ellis v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. RICK HILL, Warden, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2954 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)