From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Cal. Corr. Health Care Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 19, 2017
No. 2: 16-cv-1555 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2: 16-cv-1555 GEB KJN P

05-19-2017

BENJAMIN ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed April 11, 2017, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: May 19, 2017

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Ell1555.fta


Summaries of

Ellis v. Cal. Corr. Health Care Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 19, 2017
No. 2: 16-cv-1555 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Ellis v. Cal. Corr. Health Care Servs.

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN ELLIS, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 19, 2017

Citations

No. 2: 16-cv-1555 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2017)