Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Elliott v. Willis

113 Ill. App. 3d 848 (Ill. App. Ct. 1983)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Elliott v. Willis

1 Citing case

  1. Meyers v. Kissner

    610 N.E.2d 128 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993)

    Without passing on the validity of Rainwater's argument, we note that consideration of the viability of his counterclaim was not encompassed within the supreme court's mandate. We therefore may not consider it here. ( Elliott v. Willis (1983), 113 Ill. App.3d 848, 852, 447 N.E.2d 1062, 1065.) However, this does not foreclose consideration of this matter by the circuit court following remand.