Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:04-CV-1101.
March 28, 2007
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2007, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 177) of the order "dismissing the plaintiff's property issue," and it appearing that the motion merely reargues matters addressed by the court and disposed of in previous orders (Docs. 155, 160), see Waye v. First Citizen's Nat'l Bank, 846 F. Supp. 310, 314 (M.D. Pa.) ("A motion for reconsideration is not to be used to reargue matters already argued and disposed of."), aff'd, 31 F.3d 1174 (3d Cir. 1994), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 177) is DENIED.