From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliott v. Townes

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
May 2, 2006
1:06CV398 (M.D.N.C. May. 2, 2006)

Opinion

1:06CV398.

May 2, 2006


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIASON


Petitioner, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, has submitted a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court received the submission on April 28, 2006, which Petitioner had dated as of April 24, 2006. In reliance upon the representations set forth in the request, the Court finds that petitioner had deposits of $487.13 in the last six months and it is, therefore, determined that he must pay the $5.00 filing fee in this matter. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted for the sole purpose of entering this order and is otherwise denied.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's request to proceedin forma pauperis is granted for the sole purpose of entering this order and is otherwise denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel be denied.

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this petition be dismissed without prejudice to petitioner filing a new petition, accompanied by the $5.00 filing fee.


Summaries of

Elliott v. Townes

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
May 2, 2006
1:06CV398 (M.D.N.C. May. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Elliott v. Townes

Case Details

Full title:Michael Anthony Elliott, Petitioner, v. Selma Townes, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: May 2, 2006

Citations

1:06CV398 (M.D.N.C. May. 2, 2006)