From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliott v. Perfillio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NSW JERSEY
Aug 7, 2012
Civil No. 12-4775 (SRC) (D.N.J. Aug. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 12-4775 (SRC)

08-07-2012

MARK ELLIOTT, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH PERFILLIO, J.S.C., et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff, currently confined at Kintock Community Release Halfway House and Treatment Center in Newark, New Jersey, seeks to bring a civil action in forma pauperis, without prepayment of fees or security, asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (April 26, 1996) (the "Act"), which amends 28 U.S.C. § 1915, establishes certain financial requirements for prisoners who are attempting to bring a civil action or file an appeal in forma pauperis.

Suits brought in forma pauperis are governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Under the Act, a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis must submit an affidavit, including a statement of all assets, which states that the prisoner is unable to pay the fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The prisoner also must submit a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The prisoner must obtain this statement from the appropriate official of each prison at which he was or is confined. Id.

Even If the prisoner is granted in forma pauperis status, the prisoner must pay the full amount of the $350.00 filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). In each month that the amount in the prisoner's account exceeds $10.00, until the $350.00 filing fee Is paid, the agency having custody of the prisoner shall assess, deduct from the prisoner's account, and forward to the Clerk of the Court payment equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

Plaintiff may not have known when he submitted his complaint that he must pay the filing fee, and that even if the full filing fee, or any part of it, has been paid, the Court must dismiss the case if it finds that the action is: (1) frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). If the Court dismisses the case for any of these reasons, the Act does not permit the prisoner to get his filing fee back.

If the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions while Incarcerated, brought an action or appeal in a court that was dismissed on any of the grounds listed above, he cannot bring another action in forma pauperis unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),

In this action, Plaintiff failed to submit a complete in forma pauperis application as required by 28 O.S.C, § 1915(a) (1), (2), including a certified account statement. Plaintiff did submit an affidavit of poverty but failed to include a six-month institutional account statement certified by an Authorized Officer of the Institution as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

THEREFORE, it is on this __ day of __ 2012;

ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED, without prejudice; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee; Plaintiff is informed that administrative termination is not a "dismissal" for purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, see Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988)(prisoner mailbox rule); McDowell v. Delaware State Police, 88 F.3d 188, 191 (3d Cir. 1996); see also William-Guice v.Board of Education, 45 F.3d 161, 163 (7th Cir. 1995); and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is rendered moot by the administrative termination of this case pursuant to this order; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court sha1l send Plaintiff a blank form application to proceed in forma pauperis; and It is further

ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, M.L, King, Jr. Federal Bldg. & U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, New Jersey, 07102, within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order; Plaintiff's writing shall include either (1) a complete, signed in forma pauperis application, including a certified six-month prison account statement, or (2) the $350 filing fee; and it is further

ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Plaintiff stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete in forma pauperis application or filing fee within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; and it is finally

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close the file in this matter.

____________

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Elliott v. Perfillio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NSW JERSEY
Aug 7, 2012
Civil No. 12-4775 (SRC) (D.N.J. Aug. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Elliott v. Perfillio

Case Details

Full title:MARK ELLIOTT, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH PERFILLIO, J.S.C., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NSW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 7, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 12-4775 (SRC) (D.N.J. Aug. 7, 2012)