From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliott v. Patel

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 31, 2007
No. Misc. 07-80038 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2007)

Opinion

No. Misc. 07-80038 CRB.

January 31, 2007


ORDER


By Order filed February 15, 2006, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California declared plaintiff Vance S. Elliot a vexatious litigant. He is required to obtain leave of court before filing any new complaints. On January 8, 2007, plaintiff attempted to file five new actions with the Court; in each he seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court denied plaintiff leave to proceed in all five cases.

On January 24, 2007, plaintiff filed two new actions. Plaintiff is DENIED leave to proceed in Misc. 07-80038. Plaintiff's claim against two judges of this Court is frivolous. A party may not sue a judge in district court simply because he disagrees with the judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Elliott v. Patel

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 31, 2007
No. Misc. 07-80038 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2007)
Case details for

Elliott v. Patel

Case Details

Full title:VANCE S. ELLIOTT, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE MARILYN HALL PATEL, and JUDGE SUSAN…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 31, 2007

Citations

No. Misc. 07-80038 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2007)