From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliott v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 12, 2005
905 So. 2d 293 (La. 2005)

Summary

providing that a party seeking a modification of a consent decree must prove that "there has been a change in circumstances materially affecting the welfare of the child since the original (or previous) custody decree was entered and that the proposed modification is in the best interest of the child"

Summary of this case from Tinsley v. Tinsley

Opinion

No. 2005-C-1547.

July 12, 2005.


In re Elliott, Eric J.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 35,557; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2005 CU 0181.

Denied.

TRAYLOR, J., recused.


Summaries of

Elliott v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 12, 2005
905 So. 2d 293 (La. 2005)

providing that a party seeking a modification of a consent decree must prove that "there has been a change in circumstances materially affecting the welfare of the child since the original (or previous) custody decree was entered and that the proposed modification is in the best interest of the child"

Summary of this case from Tinsley v. Tinsley
Case details for

Elliott v. Elliott

Case Details

Full title:Eric J. ELLIOTT v. Carrie Barber ELLIOTT

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jul 12, 2005

Citations

905 So. 2d 293 (La. 2005)

Citing Cases

Trahan v. Kingrey

LSA-C.C. art. 134. Every child custody case must be viewed in light of its own particular set of facts and…

Trahan v. Kingrey

LSA–C.C. art. 134. Every child custody case must be viewed in light of its own particular set of facts and…