From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliott v. Dorian

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 4, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1667 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1667.

January 4, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW this 4th day of January, 2007, after the plaintiff filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after the defendants filed a motion to dismiss, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Elliott v. Dorian

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 4, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1667 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2007)
Case details for

Elliott v. Dorian

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. ELLIOTT, SR., Plaintiff v. RAYMOND W. DORIAN; GOVERNOR EDWARD G…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 4, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1667 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2007)

Citing Cases

Elliott v. Folino

Dkt. [4]. The court finds that none of the objections are persuasive. The Report listed the three strikes as…

Elliott v. Beard

http://ujsportal.pacourts.us/PublicReporting/PublicReporting.aspx?rt=…