From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliot v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 9, 2011
No. C 11-80128 RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-80128 RS

11-09-2011

VANCE S. ELLIOT, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS LEWIS, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE

COMPLAINT

On June 16, 2011, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice, as plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis had been denied and plaintiff had not paid the filing fee as instructed to maintain the suit. After the case was closed, and without paying the filing fee, plaintiff submitted an amended complaint. The Court denied him leave to file an amended complaint and declined to reopen the case. On October 28, 2011, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. As plaintiff still has not complied with the Court's instruction to pay the filing fee, his resubmission of an amended complaint does not reopen the case. Further, plaintiff is advised that he may be subject to sanctions if he persists in filing pleadings without paying the filing fee. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:

Vance S. Elliott

640 Eddy Street, #218

San Francisco, CA 94109

Chambers Staff

Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg


Summaries of

Elliot v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 9, 2011
No. C 11-80128 RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Elliot v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:VANCE S. ELLIOT, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS LEWIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-80128 RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)