From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elliot v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 14, 2011
No. C 11-80128 RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-80128 RS

10-14-2011

VANCE S. ELLIOT, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS LEWIS, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE

COMPLAINT

On June 16, 2011, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice, as plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis had been denied and plaintiff had not paid the filing fee as instructed to maintain the suit. After the case was closed, plaintiff submitted an amended complaint. As plaintiff still has not complied with the Court's instruction to pay the filing fee, his amended complaint does not serve to reopen the case and the file shall remain closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:

Vance S. Elliott

640 Eddy Street, #218

San Francisco, CA 94109

Chambers Staff

Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg


Summaries of

Elliot v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 14, 2011
No. C 11-80128 RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Elliot v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:VANCE S. ELLIOT, Plaintiff, v. MARCUS LEWIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-80128 RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)