Opinion
2:21-cv-02083-GMN-DJA
01-21-2022
ANTHONY ELLICK, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL CONSUMER TELECOM & UTILITIES EXCHANGE, INC.; AND DIRECTV, LLC, Defendants.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant, DIRECTV, LLC FREEDOM LAW FIRM Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq. George Haines, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Anthony Ellick
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant, DIRECTV, LLC
FREEDOM LAW FIRM
Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq.
George Haines, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Anthony Ellick
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER (SECOND REQUEST)
Plaintiff, Anthony Ellick (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant, DIRECTV, LLC (“Defendant”), by and though their undersigned counsel, hereby move that Defendant shall have up and including February 11, 2022, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. The parties request the additional time to continue to discuss settlement prior to Defendant filing an answer or otherwise responding the complaint. This motion is filed in good faith and not intended to cause delay. This is the parties' second request of an extension of time to answer the complaint by Defendant. The court previously issued an order extending the time for Defendant to respond to January 21, 2022 [ECF No. 14].
As part of this motion, Defendant agrees to participate in any Rule 26(f) conference that occurs during the pendency of this extension.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.