From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellenbecker v. Howe

U.S.
Mar 28, 1994
511 U.S. 1005 (1994)

Summary

holding that discriminatory remarks, "when unrelated to the decisional process, are insufficient to demonstrate that the employer relied on illegitimate criteria"

Summary of this case from Kennedy v. Schoenberg, Fisher & Newman, Ltd.

Opinion

No. 93-1288.

March 28, 1994.


ORDERS

C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 8 F. 3d 1258.


Summaries of

Ellenbecker v. Howe

U.S.
Mar 28, 1994
511 U.S. 1005 (1994)

holding that discriminatory remarks, "when unrelated to the decisional process, are insufficient to demonstrate that the employer relied on illegitimate criteria"

Summary of this case from Kennedy v. Schoenberg, Fisher & Newman, Ltd.

noting that the plaintiff "failed to adequately address the defendant's evidence of her substandard job performance in [prior years]"

Summary of this case from Bahl v. Royal Indemnity Co.
Case details for

Ellenbecker v. Howe

Case Details

Full title:ELLENBECKER, SECRETARY, SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ET AL…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 28, 1994

Citations

511 U.S. 1005 (1994)

Citing Cases

Bahl v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Under the indirect evidence approach, a plaintiff must establish a prima facie case. Hong v. Children's Mem.…

Vinson v. Cummins Engine Co. , Inc., (S.D.Ind. 1999)

To fulfill that duty, the non-movant must "go beyond the pleadings" and set forth specific facts to show that…