From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellawendy v. Monterey Cnty. Superior Court

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 10, 2023
20-02708 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2023)

Opinion

20-02708 BLF (PR)

01-10-2023

ABDELFATAH ELLAWENDY, Petitioner, v. MONTEREY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner moves for the appointment of counsel. Dkt No. 31. The Sixth Amendment's right to counsel does not apply in habeas corpus actions. See Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722, 728 (9th Cir. 1986). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes a district court to appoint counsel to represent a habeas petitioner whenever “the court determines that the interests of justice so require” and such person is financially unable to obtain representation. Appointment is not warranted in this case. Not only has Petitioner failed to present any argument in support of his motion, but there are also no pending deadlines as Petitioner has already filed a traverse, Dkt. No. 30. Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ellawendy v. Monterey Cnty. Superior Court

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 10, 2023
20-02708 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Ellawendy v. Monterey Cnty. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:ABDELFATAH ELLAWENDY, Petitioner, v. MONTEREY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 10, 2023

Citations

20-02708 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2023)