From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellakkany v. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 7, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-983 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 7, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-983

09-07-2016

MOURAD ELLAKKANY, Plaintiff v. THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, et al., Defendants


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2016, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 56) of Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab, recommending the court construe the correspondence (Docs. 54-55) filed by pro se plaintiff Mourad Ellakkany ("Ellakkany"), advising the court of his desire to withdraw his complaint, as notices of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and it appearing that neither party objects to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d at 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court in agreement with Judge Schwab's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 56) of Magistrate Judge Schwab is ADOPTED.

2. Ellakkany's correspondence (Doc. 54-55) are CONSTRUED as notices of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(i).

3. Ellakkany's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED.

4. Defendants' pending motions (Docs. 16, 29) to dismiss are DENIED as moot.

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Ellakkany v. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 7, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-983 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Ellakkany v. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MOURAD ELLAKKANY, Plaintiff v. THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 7, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-983 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 7, 2016)